SES # | TOPICS | READINGS |
---|---|---|
1 | Introduction | No required readings. Just show up. |
2-3 | Zeno | Sainsbury. Chapter 1. If you're up for a fun (and very short) philosophy read, you can check out: Parsons, Josh. "The Eleatic hangover cure." Revised in 2006. Originally published in Analysis 64, no. 4 (2004). (PDF)# |
4-6 | Infinity | Required Reading Rucker. Chapter 1. (No need to feel guilty if you skip the last three sections: Infinity in the Mindscape, The Absolute Infinite, and Connections.) Recommended Reading For those of you who want to go through the proofs, I also recommend: Fraenkel, A. Set Theory and Logic. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1966, section 3. |
7-9 | The Higher Infinite | Required Reading Rucker. Chapter 2. Recommended Reading Rucker. Excursion I. |
10-11 | Set Theory | Required Reading Sainsbury. Section 5.1. Recommended Reading Rucker. Chapter 5. |
12-13 | Vagueness | Required Reading Wright, Crispin. "Language-mastery and the sorites paradox." In Truth and Meaning: Essays in Semantics. Edited by Gareth Evans and John Henry McDowell. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, 1976, pp. 223-247. ISBN: 0198245173. Reprinted in Vagueness: A Reader. Reprint ed. Edited by Rosanna Keefe and Peter Smith. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999, pp. 151-173. ISBN: 0262611457. |
14-15 | Newcomb's Puzzle | Required Reading Sainsbury. Chapter 3. Recommended Reading Lewis, David. "Prisonsers' Dilemma Is a Newcomb Problem." Philosophy and Public Affairs 8, no. 3 (Spring 1979): 235-240. ———. "Causal Decision Theory." Philosophical Papers. Vol. 2. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1986. ISBN: 0195036468. (difficult reading) |
16-17 | The Liar Paradox | Required Reading Sainsbury. Sections 5.2 through 5.9. Recommended Reading Tarski, Alfred. "The Semantic Conception of Truth: and the Foundations of Semantics." Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4, no. 3 (March 1944): 341-376. |
18-19 | Computability | Recommended Reading Boolos, George S., John P. Burgess, and Richard C. Jeffrey. Computability and Logic. 4th ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2002, chapters 3 and 4, pp. 23-44. |
20-21 | Backward Induction and Common Knowledge | Required Reading Carroll, John. "The Backward Induction Argument." Theory and Decision: An International Journal for Methods and Models in the Social and Decision Sciences 48, no. 1 (February 200): 61-84. |
22-23 | Godel's Theorem | Required Reading Rucker. Excursion II. Recommended Reading For those who want to have a look at the proofs (very difficult - but this is, after all, MIT): Mendelson, Elliott. Introduction to Mathematical Logic. 4th ed. London, UK: Chapman & Hall, 1997, Chapter 3. ISBN: 0412808307. |
24-27 | Godel's Theorem (cont.) | Required Reading Sainsbury. Chapter 3. Recommended Reading Lewis, David. "Prisonsers' Dilemma Is a Newcomb Problem." Philosophy and Public Affairs 8, no. 3 (Spring 1979): 235-240. ———. "Causal Decision Theory." Philosophical Papers. Vol. 2. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1986. ISBN: 0195036468. (difficult reading) |